Jason Lowery’s Softwar “thesis” is an entire joke. It’s a mixture of incoherent, and subtly so, argumentation about cybersecurity and a repackaging of outdated subjects of dialogue that have been totally explored a decade earlier than Jason Lowery turned a reputation that anybody was aware of on this house.
First let’s take a look at the nation state mining “defensive weaponry” nonsense. Nation states being incentivized to mine, or help mining of their jurisdictions, shouldn’t be some novel thought of Jason’s. It’s a broadly mentioned dynamic going way back to 2011-2013. Basically each Bitcoiner since that point interval who has been concerned sufficient on this house to review and talk about the place issues have been getting in the long run has thought-about the dynamic of countries getting concerned with mining if Bitcoin was truly profitable in its development long run.
If Bitcoin ever turned geopolitically related at a world scale, nation states have been at all times going to take an curiosity within the mining sector. Nation states have an involvement in regulating all main commodities and their manufacturing, from gold to grease and pure fuel. This isn’t some novel thesis or notion, it is not uncommon sense that was apparent to each random nerd who was on this house over a decade in the past.
The facet of Bitcoin securing knowledge nonetheless is patently absurd and incoherent. Bitcoin doesn’t “safe” knowledge. It may timestamp knowledge, however that’s not a magic assure of safety. It does nothing by any means to guard knowledge from exfiltration (being accessed by unauthorized individuals and copied), nor does it assure integrity or accuracy. All knowledge on the blockchain is publicly accessible to anybody operating a node. The thought of Bitcoin being helpful for controlling entry to info is simply absurd. By its very nature any knowledge placed on Bitcoin is accessible by actually anybody. That’s the complete bedrock it’s based mostly on, every thing being open and clear in order that it may be verified.
So let’s speak about paywalls, APIs, and nonsense gibberish like “digital vitality.” Lowery’s subsequent massive leap is that charging in bitcoin for API calls someway improves safety. That is full nonsense. Proscribing entry to an API is completed for 2 causes, 1) to handle useful resource use and cease them from being wasted, or 2) to solely permit particular people you have got approved to entry the API. Bitcoin will help with the previous barely, however does nothing by any means to assist with the latter.
Even monetizing an API with bitcoin doesn’t actually assist useful resource administration defending in opposition to DoS assaults. Folks can nonetheless ship packets to your machine with out a cost. These packets nonetheless must be diverted or managed by conventional DoS techniques, which generally work by blackholing packets, or redirecting them away out of your system. Bitcoin funds do nothing to eliminate the necessity to do such issues.
A cash that anybody can get their arms on does nothing to limit entry to a system to solely particular individuals that you just need to entry that system. Cryptography does that. Passwords try this. Applied sciences that exist already utterly independently of, and haven’t any want for, Bitcoin. To not point out that even with such techniques correctly carried out, the {hardware} and software program on the system being secured is in the end what secures that system. Folks don’t fail to breach a server as a result of “Bitcoin is defending it,” they fail as a result of the safety techniques on that server are correctly carried out.
Bitcoin, and even correct cryptography with out Bitcoin, does nothing to maintain a system safe when implementations are completed incorrectly or flaws exist in these techniques. That’s the root of cybersecurity, and Bitcoin does completely nothing to alter it. It doesn’t assist {hardware} be free from flaws, or safety software program be free from bugs. This complete facet of his “thesis” is completely incoherent gibberish, that makes no logical sense in any respect. It’s a con to sucker in individuals who don’t perceive these items and construct a popularity by hiding incoherence and incompetence behind clueless individuals cheerleading.
And the entire “Bitcoin will cease wars” nonsense as a result of nation states will compete with mining in opposition to one another? Laughable. Bitcoin mining won’t change the geopolitical competitors over agricultural lands, pure assets, tactical army positions, or something that nation states go to battle over. It’s pure delusion.
Jason Lowery doesn’t have a “thesis”, he has a pile of incoherent rubbish taped collectively round a single remark that an uncountable variety of Bitcoiners had a decade earlier than he ever entered this house. It’s an entire joke, and anybody shopping for it demonstrates they’ve zero vital considering expertise or familiarity with the related subject material.
This text is a Take. Opinions expressed are solely the creator’s and don’t essentially replicate these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.
