Just how rich are Arab rulers?

Unlock the Editor’s Digest without cost

It’s no secret that Gulf autocrats management severe cheddar. A (paywalled) report out this month makes an attempt to estimate fairly how a lot.

Totting up the obtainable numbers, International SWF reckon the Gulf Cooperation Council’s ruling households management round $6.8 trillion of property. That’s two entire Apples! Click on via the chart beneath to see how this breaks down by state, class and fund:

What do these funds even do with $6.8 trillion? It seems, at the least 4 issues.

First, they diversify their economies past the anticipated lifetime of the reservoir of hydrocarbons upon which the area floats.

Second, they project soft power internationally. Suppose football, golf, media, universities, perhaps even the capture of international professional elites via butlering gigs.

Third, buy garish bling and stroke rulers’ giant egos.

Lastly, they personal just about every thing in touching distance. In line with the report, Gulf SWFs personal each one in all their nationwide champions throughout each main trade. State capitalism at its most evident (high-res here):

But it surely’s not simply champions. In addition they personal most of all shares listed in GCC.

The report’s authors combed via the share registers of every of the 877 firms listed within the area and located that 68 per cent of the Abu Dhabi market cap is owned by native SWFs and royal household workplaces. In Saudi, a full 77 per cent of the market is owned by PIF and the state. For the GCC general, 70 per cent of market capitalisation is finally state-owned.

Admittedly, a lot of that is owing to the outsized prominence of the Saudi market within the area, and the outsized prominence of the just about wholly state-owned Aramco. However nonetheless:

Hold on, is that this an opportunity for another marimekko moment?!

Regardless of proudly owning a lot of their listed markets, GCC authorities have nonetheless made some efforts to get outsiders all for their shares. These efforts have had combined outcomes.

Norway’s $1.7 trillion mega-SWF NBIM divested all its Saudi shares in 2021. And Norway’s largest home pension fund KLP dumped GCC stocks on human rights issues in 2023. Sweden’s large pension fund AP7 blacklisted Saudi Aramco — which makes up round 1 / 4 of the area’s market cap — at the beginning of the yr, though this didn’t cease Saudi from promoting $11.2bn of inventory over the summer time, albeit on the bottom end of the range and at a 6 per cent low cost to the market. And regardless of its phenomenal share worth progress, IHC (which constitutes round a 3rd of Abu Dhabi’s ADX change market cap) principally just perplexes worldwide traders.

However passive traders? They’re far more enthused. Or, at the least, they’ve discovered their cash poured into the area following selections made by the index suppliers to whom they’ve outsourced funding decision-making. MSCI’s choice to incorporate UAE and Qatar (in 2014), Saudi (in 2019), and Kuwait (in 2020) to its indices has meant anybody committing money to a MSCI EM or MSCI ACWI tracker fund is shopping for shares within the area.

The BIS noted that MSCI and FTSE’s admission of Saudi shares to their indices in 2019 coincided with international fairness flows into the nation that exceeded these heading to India and China. And MSCI themselves calculate that international funding in Saudi shares has more than quadrupled from $23.5bn to $97.5bn since their index inclusion choice was made.

Considerably unusually, the research consists of Royal Personal Places of work — a class of state-controlled property we haven’t seen analysed earlier than. These account for a cool $0.5tn, or about half a Berkshire Hathaway, which sounds perhaps much less spectacular. Virtually $350bnof these property are run for the UAE’s ruling Al Nahyan family alone. However because the authors be aware:

This group of entities, led by Abu Dhabi’s Royal Group and all its subsidiaries, is much more opaque than SWFs … hyperlinks to the royal households could make the boundaries between SWFs and RPOs blurry at occasions.